On 06/14/2011 07:08 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
You already are maintaining multiple UI systems which seem to me to be much more complex thanOn 06/14/2011 04:36 PM, Rudolf Kastl wrote:I never proposed having alternatives for each of the core systems either... There is already a viable alternative that works. inittab contains atm exactly one line... the one with the default runlevel... and /etc/fstab can be parsed differently if there are changes.systemd doesn't use /etc/inittab and upstart uses it. So you have to account for the differences and test them.Also i do not understand the Argument with the unit files... they are systemd related. upstart isnt affected. Since upstart isnt installed by default anyways it also doesent matter for "critical path". Got a hard time to follow your argumentation there. SystemV init scripts are already present and work quite well aswell.You miss the point. Packages are already dropping init scripts and converting to using systemd unit files. To maintain upstart compatibility you have to continue to maintain sys init scripts in addition to systemd unit files and again make sure they don't diverge and they both work equivalently. Who is volunteering for that? Rahul two different "init" systems. --
Stephen Clark NetWolves Sr. Software Engineer III Phone: 813-579-3200 Fax: 813-882-0209 Email: steve.clark@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.netwolves.com |
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
