On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 21:44 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > > I wouldn't bother much if it would be just one tiny bit of strange code > > in systemd, but it is FAR from being the only such code. There are lots > > of similar stuff, and it's not accidental. > > It is definitely not accidental, but unless you have bugs to file, I > don't think complain generically about systemd architecture here is any > productive. Where, in your opinion, is the place to discuss systemd architecture? > We discussed systemd for quite a while here and it certainly > far from perfect, for some things probably not even "good" yet. But its > time to file bugs for real problems, not time for bike shedding on > architectural decision that have been taken quite a while ago. I disagree, and I find the attitude "we are developers, you are idiot" both quite common and quite wrong. I am a developer too, do you want me to treat *you* this way too when you will have trouble with my software? -- vda -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
