On Sun, 12.06.11 18:59, Reindl Harald (h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > Am 12.06.2011 18:56, schrieb drago01: > > On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> > >> Am 12.06.2011 18:53, schrieb drago01: > >>> On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >>> upstart is still maintained and shipped, you should be able to install > >>> and use it. > >> > >> and why in the world is systemd forced after a upgrade via yum where > >> upstart was in use before - upgrades should left core configurations > >> in peace! > > > > Upgrade usually means progress not stagnation, if you want to stay in > > the past don't upgrade. > > you said "upstart is still maintained and shipped, you should be able to > install and use it" - so how and why damned must be a init-replace > in a early state forced on a existing system? systemd surpasses Upstart in every way. It's not in an "early state". Upstart is much more limited and hence in a much earlier state feature-wise. > normally this should be "systemd is also available for upgraded systems > and you should be able to install and use it" Yes, it was in F14. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
