On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 15:12 +0200, Michael Schroeder wrote: > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 03:51:48PM +0300, Jonathan Dieter wrote: > > The problem is that yum-presto can be a bit of a memory hog (or, more > > accurately, deltarpm is). > > While it's true that *create*deltarpm needs quite some memory, > *apply*deltarpm was designed to have a low memory footprint. > So I doubt that it's the culprit here. You're definitely right that applydeltarpm has a *far* lower memory footprint than createdeltarpm. But, looking at the original traceback, it looks like it isn't getting enough memory when it's trying to verify the sequence. Having said that, applydeltarpm definitely isn't in the class of "memory hog". Reading back through, that's the implication of my statement, so I apologize. Jonathan
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
