Re: 9base in Fedora?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 02:23:44PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > As I understand it, the best way to do this in Fedora, with respect to
> > same ideas in this thread, would be having %{_libexecdir}/plan9 or similar,
> > with bin, lib and share (or whatever upstream supplies) subdirectories.
> You understood it wrong, %{_libexecdir}/plan9 should contain only binaries
> and nothing else, the rest would go into %{_libdir}/plan9.

I don't understand why exactly %{_libexecdir}/plan9/* would be preferable to
the more-straightforward /usr/bin/plan9/*. Generally, programs that are in
libexec are meant to _not_ be executed directly, which is not the case here.

-- 
Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx>
Senior Systems Architect -- Instructional & Research Computing Services
Harvard School of Engineering & Applied Sciences
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux