Re: yum / dist-upgrade / memory

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 06:00:57PM +0300, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> You're definitely right that applydeltarpm has a *far* lower memory
> footprint than createdeltarpm.  But, looking at the original traceback,
> it looks like it isn't getting enough memory when it's trying to verify
> the sequence.

Hmm, to me the traceback looks like the fork() system call in
yum failed, so applydeltarpm isn't even running.

Cheers,
  Michael.

-- 
Michael Schroeder                                   mls@xxxxxxx
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH,  GF Jeff Hawn, HRB 16746 AG Nuernberg
main(_){while(_=~getchar())putchar(~_-1/(~(_|32)/13*2-11)*13);}
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux