On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 20:24 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Wed, 25.05.11 13:04, Petr Lautrbach (plautrba@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > > > > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:33:50AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > today this update: > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/upstart-1.2-2.fc14 > > > got pushed to F14. (FWIW, I don't see how this is consistent with the update > > > policies, but that's not the matter here.) > > > > Hi, > > > > upstart-1.x branch is considered as stable and it's recommended update, see [1] > > > > > upstart-1.2-2 hasn't changed upstart behavior. It fixes upstream bugs and also adds new > > features like new stanzas (manual,debug) and also .override files > > feature adapted from Ubuntu > > Hmpf. Does it really make sense updating a packagein a released distro > with features like this? New distros should have new features not old > ones, and with your change you broke F15... . TBH, if the F15 upgrade replied on a specific version of upstart in F14, then arrangement should have been made with the upstart maintainer to coordinate any change. Where these arrangements made ? Simo. -- Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
