On 05/25/2011 08:24 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Wed, 25.05.11 13:04, Petr Lautrbach (plautrba@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > >> >> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:33:50AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> today this update: >>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/upstart-1.2-2.fc14 >>> got pushed to F14. (FWIW, I don't see how this is consistent with the update >>> policies, but that's not the matter here.) >> >> Hi, >> >> upstart-1.x branch is considered as stable and it's recommended update, see [1] >>> >> upstart-1.2-2 hasn't changed upstart behavior. It fixes upstream bugs and also adds new >> features like new stanzas (manual,debug) and also .override files >> feature adapted from Ubuntu > > Hmpf. Does it really make sense updating a packagein a released distro > with features like this? New distros should have new features not old > ones, and with your change you broke F15... . > No, I didn't. upstart would be installed in F15 even without last F14 upstart update [1]. upstart > 0.6.5-11 hit F15 in October 2010. upstart-0.6.5-12 and higher obsoletes upstart-sysvinit (#635323) in the same way as systemd so yum pulls them both. [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707507#c6 -- Petr Lautrbach, Red Hat, Inc. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
