Re: 9base in Fedora?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 02:35:09PM -0400, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Putting them in your path's just going to break things.
> 
> The plan is to have them _prefixed_ in your path, and un-prefixed in a
> specified directory so you can frob the path to run scripts that
> expect p9 utilities.
> 
> I am not sure what this package specifically brings, but many p9
> utilities have *very* interesting ideas.
> 
> I have tested p9 before in VMs and I'll be installing this package
> (when it comes through) to poke around and see.

I don't think 9base provides a great deal - it's just the Plan 9 version 
of the basic Unix shell utilities. If there's interesting and useful 
ideas in them it'd make more sense to work on porting the functionality 
to coreutils.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux