On Tue, 10 May 2011 17:00:30 -0400 Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 02:54:44PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > > The breakage is fine, one expects that. A fundamental breakage > > that the relevant developers don't even notice for weeks is another > > question; as I said, that suggests that people running Rawhide are > > few and far between. > > I'm concerned because there was a bugzilla entry sitting there piling > up tons of duplicates. A "normal user" -- even of Rawhide -- might > expect that to be enough to make sure the issue gets on the relevant > developers' radar. Yeah, related to that: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-engineering-services/ticket/24 If we had a way to figure out how to denote these bugs, I think it would be useful to send out a report on them once a week or so. That way when maintainers are busy/unable to look at things, we can see what the 'hot bugs' are and others can try and lend a hand. Unfortunately, it's not easy to get that kind of thing out of bugzilla. ;( > Starting threads with melodramatic attention-getting subject lines > should not be the way to get things done. :) Agreed. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
