Re: illegal instruction - create compile variants ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> There is the STT_GNU_IFUNC feature implemented for it - the indirect is
> handled by linker without an additional indirect overhead if applied for a
> shared library function. For apps it works in a similar way as normal
> indirect.

Are there any caveats (initialization order or so) when using this feature? 
E.g. would one get away with calling something like
http://api.kde.org/4.0-api/kdelibs-apidocs/solid/html/tutorial3.html (i.e. 
Solid::Processor::instructionSets) in the ifunc or would trying to call such 
C++ classes lead to errors or unpredictable behavior?

And I presume this is available on ELF glibc targets only, isn't it?

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux