Re: illegal instruction - create compile variants ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/05/11 16:47, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Rpm's and Fedora's philosophy is to let rpm specify/dictate CFLAGS,
> which packages are supposed to respect.
Yes, I still have VSs bug (514991) regarding opt flags still open.

So, for the lesser CPU problem, does that mean I just suggest, rebuild 
srpm on their machine ?

Can I add that minimum CPU requirement to package description ?

If a user wanted to rebuild srpm for their CPU, would it be acceptable 
to place some sort of conditional in the spec make line, so that the 
local CPU build could use a suitable Instruction Set ?

Would it still be worth adding a CPU detect script to avoid abrt traces 
from non-compatible CPU machines. In this case, could it just exit, or 
leave a message to suggest the user to obtain and rebuild the srpm ?
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux