Re: illegal instruction - create compile variants ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/05/11 06:31, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> David Timms wrote:
>> Should I be suggesting to upstream to attempt to detect CPU before
>> running non-available instructions, eg as part of app startup ?
Further, what can I run over an existing executable to detect what CPU 
it was built for, ie what instuctions have been included ?

> Yes, all the packages which have WORKING support for SSE etc. in Fedora do
> that. See e.g.
> https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/kdelibs/repository/revisions/master/entry/solid/solid/backends/shared/cpufeatures.cpp
> https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/kdelibs/repository/revisions/master/entry/solid/solid/backends/udev/cpuinfo.cpp
> https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/kdelibs/repository/revisions/master/entry/solid/solid/backends/udev/udevprocessor.cpp
> for the implementation Solid (in kdelibs) uses.
Thanks Kevin, I'll make the suggestion to developers, and see if they 
are interested. Cheers, David.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux