Hi, I'm adding a subpackage -manual to audacity to include the additional manual archive. It links from the help menu items if it is installed, or else points you to the in development online version. I already made a mistake and included manual files in both the main and sub package. The spec change [1] I've committed fixes this. The -manual package can be used by either audacity or audacity-freeworld. At the moment the manual spec marks up the datadair/audacity folder and hence dually owns it with audacity if that is installed. Reading the packaging examples, seems that this can sometimes be OK, but does what I've done make sense ? Or should I Require the audacity (or audacity-freeworld) package, and not add the datadir/audacity folder to the -manual directory. Thirdly, vague recollection of one source/package. Should the -manual just be a separate package anyway (review?) ? It's likely to be updated more often, but not necessarily in sync with the program. 4. Being new to git/fedpkg, how can I tell which branch I'm on ? [1] <http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=audacity.git;a=blob_plain;f=audacity.spec;hb=f14/master> -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
