Re: critpath approval process seems rather broken

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 18:19 -0700, Christopher Aillon wrote:

> I just realized today for the first time that our nightlies are based on 
> stable, not testing.  I think that's something we need to address.  It's 
> probably still useful to have nightlies based on stable, but I think 
> it's rather vital to have images created with the updates in the queue.

It would be nice to have both, but we didn't previously have the
resources; we may do now they're being done by Bodhi. But we always
intentionally picked the 'stable' case as we felt it was the more useful
of the two, given we could only have one.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux