Re: critpath approval process seems rather broken

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Will Woods wrote:
> In fact, there's plenty of approvers available, but you're not engaging
> with them. They might not know how to test libtiff, or what needs
> testing, so other stuff gets tested first.

The fact is, this is a SECURITY UPDATE and as such it should go out even 
without testing. It's not acceptable to sit on security updates for weeks. 
And it's just a FACT that Fedora n-1 gets near-zero testing.

> The solution is simple: ASK FOR HELP.

The solution is simple: The red tape on update pushing needs to be repealed.

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux