On 03/30/2011 04:12 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > On Wednesday, March 30, 2011 04:05:27 PM Orcan Ogetbil wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 9:21 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: >>> On Wed, 30.03.11 15:08, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >>>> On 03/30/2011 02:30 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: >>>>> On Wed, 30.03.11 18:04, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Also, can somebody point me to the place where the FHS would say "no >>>>> other directories below / are allowed"? I can't find that. And hence >>>>> this change is perfectly FHS compliant. >>>> >>>> It's in the preface of the root file system section: >>>> >>>> http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#THEROOTFILESYSTEM >>>> >>>> <cite> >>>> Applications must never create or require special files or >>>> subdirectories in the root directory. Other locations in the FHS >>>> hierarchy provide more than enough flexibility for any package. >>>> </cite> >>> >>> Well, we are not an "application", are we? >> >> I think, for the first time in Fedora history, I agree with Lennart. > > +1, me too :))) > > R. > >> After reading the above reference, this does not seem like an FHS >> violation. Even if it is, it is the FHS that needs to be updated. Then you might be able to explain the difference between a script being launched by systemd and any other arbitrary script? I don't see any, -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
