On Wednesday, March 30, 2011 04:05:27 PM Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 9:21 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Wed, 30.03.11 15:08, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > >> On 03/30/2011 02:30 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > >> > On Wed, 30.03.11 18:04, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> > Also, can somebody point me to the place where the FHS would say "no > >> > other directories below / are allowed"? I can't find that. And hence > >> > this change is perfectly FHS compliant. > >> > >> It's in the preface of the root file system section: > >> > >> http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#THEROOTFILESYSTEM > >> > >> <cite> > >> Applications must never create or require special files or > >> subdirectories in the root directory. Other locations in the FHS > >> hierarchy provide more than enough flexibility for any package. > >> </cite> > > > > Well, we are not an "application", are we? > > I think, for the first time in Fedora history, I agree with Lennart. +1, me too :))) R. > After reading the above reference, this does not seem like an FHS > violation. Even if it is, it is the FHS that needs to be updated. > > Orcan -- Jaroslav ÅeznÃk <jreznik@xxxxxxxxxx> Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno Office: +420 532 294 275 Mobile: +420 602 797 774 Red Hat, Inc. http://cz.redhat.com/ -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
