On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 9:21 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Wed, 30.03.11 15:08, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > >> >> On 03/30/2011 02:30 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: >> > On Wed, 30.03.11 18:04, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> > >> >> > Also, can somebody point me to the place where the FHS would say "no >> > other directories below / are allowed"? I can't find that. And hence >> > this change is perfectly FHS compliant. >> >> It's in the preface of the root file system section: >> >> http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#THEROOTFILESYSTEM >> >> <cite> >> Applications must never create or require special files or >> subdirectories in the root directory. Other locations in the FHS >> hierarchy provide more than enough flexibility for any package. >> </cite> > > Well, we are not an "application", are we? > I think, for the first time in Fedora history, I agree with Lennart. After reading the above reference, this does not seem like an FHS violation. Even if it is, it is the FHS that needs to be updated. Orcan -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
