Re: state of systemd in Fedora and services pledge

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2011/2/24 Marcela Mašláňová <mmaslano@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> On 02/23/2011 10:08 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>> W dniu 23 lutego 2011 21:48 użytkownik Tomasz Torcz
>> <tomek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> napisał:
>>> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 08:40:01PM +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I wonder what is the actual state of Fedora systemd integration? I
>>>> hope that there is more systemd native services than listed on
>>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Johannbg/QA/Systemd/compatability
>>>
> This link contains at least in my case incorrect unit files, which were
> not applied. I received duplicates of bugs on my daemons.

I'm so sorry that I wrote a systemd service for daemon that you
maintain. I hope that you forgive me someday...

> Proposed
> patches in these bugzillas were wrong or incomplete.

Worked ok for me. Of course everything can be improved - so the final
version is best

> There should be at least fixed links on web-page to point to
> current/correct version of unit files.
>
> See:
> at: #656869, #617320
> cronie: #656864, #617324
>
>>>  I have written handful of service definitions for packages listed there,
>>> filling bugs in bugzilla afterwards.  Not a single maintainer responded :(
>>
>> I hope that developers of these packages will wake up soon :)
> Guidelines for packaging are still only a draft and developers are
> receiving misleading patches. You can't be surprised that people who own
> complicated packages are not willing to simply accept your patches or
> start their own units.
>
>>
>> It is possible that the problem described by Toshio Kuratomi has some
>> connection with this. But OTOH a few of the services that I have
>> written was accepted by maintainers
>>
>>>
>>>  OTOH, one upstream accepted unit definition and will ship with next version.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Tomasz Torcz            There exists no separation between gods and men:
>>> xmpp: zdzichubg@xxxxxxxxx   one blends softly casual into the other.
>>>
>>> --
>>> devel mailing list
>>> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Marcela Mašláňová
> BaseOS team Brno
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>



-- 
Best regards,
Michal

http://eventhorizon.pl/
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux