On 02/23/2011 10:08 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: > W dniu 23 lutego 2011 21:48 użytkownik Tomasz Torcz > <tomek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> napisał: >> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 08:40:01PM +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I wonder what is the actual state of Fedora systemd integration? I >>> hope that there is more systemd native services than listed on >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Johannbg/QA/Systemd/compatability >> This link contains at least in my case incorrect unit files, which were not applied. I received duplicates of bugs on my daemons. Proposed patches in these bugzillas were wrong or incomplete. There should be at least fixed links on web-page to point to current/correct version of unit files. See: at: #656869, #617320 cronie: #656864, #617324 >> I have written handful of service definitions for packages listed there, >> filling bugs in bugzilla afterwards. Not a single maintainer responded :( > > I hope that developers of these packages will wake up soon :) Guidelines for packaging are still only a draft and developers are receiving misleading patches. You can't be surprised that people who own complicated packages are not willing to simply accept your patches or start their own units. > > It is possible that the problem described by Toshio Kuratomi has some > connection with this. But OTOH a few of the services that I have > written was accepted by maintainers > >> >> OTOH, one upstream accepted unit definition and will ship with next version. >> >> -- >> Tomasz Torcz There exists no separation between gods and men: >> xmpp: zdzichubg@xxxxxxxxx one blends softly casual into the other. >> >> -- >> devel mailing list >> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >> > > > -- Marcela Mašláňová BaseOS team Brno -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
