Re: librsvg2 unmaintained?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 22:55 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 13:32:34 -0800, Adam wrote:
> 
> > Dropping a snide criticism in a message on a mailing list which is
> > purportedly about something else entirely is exactly passive-aggressive:
> 
> What the heck is your mission?

sorry, it's just that people are forever criticizing abrt in this list
and it gets really tiring. I probably over-reacted somewhat. My bad.

> Return to the 1st post in this thread. My comment on the "many false
> positive dupes" is related to what I've written in the 1st post. It
> explains why there are many dupes in that ticket. It also suggests that
> several more of the bug reporters probably are not affected by the crash
> in librsvg2 (even though it crashes nautilus during thumbnail generation),
> but by other bugs. The latest test update of ABRT in bodhi mentions
> improved duplicate detection. So, there is a pattern. Now move on, please.

Moving!
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux