Re: librsvg2 unmaintained?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 14:57 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/553069 (Nautilus) piles up duplicates.
> 
> I've pointed out what's going wrong in librsvg2, one way to prevent the
> crash, and that there is another duplicate (for F-13) here:
>   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553069#c8
>   --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603183
> 
> Test-case files are attached to the ticket, another file is linked in a
> comment.
> 
> The upstream ticket file several months ago about librsvg2 is unanswered,
> too:
> 
>   https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=626802
> 
> Is librsvg2 unmaintained?

I would say it is 'weakly' maintained, like a great many other modules.

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux