2011/1/24 Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx>: > Simo Sorce wrote: >> You are free to volunteer to do that, I am not going to do it for >> samba4, I simply do not have the time to waste on such a thing. >> (Samba4 people are in strict contact with the waf author and use >> regularly the svn version du jour to fix build bugs they found, good >> luck trying to make samba4 build right with months old releases that do >> not include all necessary fixes). > > I think the cleaner approach would actually be to aggressively update waf > and to fix projects to build with a newer waf, not an older one. Simo was talking about samba4 using trunk versions instead of released versions iiuc, so: no, it is not a matter of more aggressively updating waf. Normally we ship released versions of our software, not devel aka trunk versions. That said I'm always open to adding single patches to the waf package if that helps any other package, preferredly from svn (as that shows that upstream knows and already approved these patches). Of course someone has to file bz tickets, so I get to know. - Thomas -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
