On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 13:31 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > But waf does make periodic releases so that might not be the right > exception. If you could draw parallels between the autotools and waf, that > might be a way to look at it. I'll note, though, that the autotools have > a layer that is used to create the build scripts which should not be bundled > (autoconf, automake, and the like), and a layer that is the actual build > scripts (configure.ac, Makefile.am, etc) which are bundled so we'd need to > figure out if waf should fit that same mold. No, waf does the actual build step as well. Upstream's take on this is: https://code.google.com/p/waf/wiki/FAQ#Why_is_packaging_of_waf_in_distributions_discouraged? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
