On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Sounds like the gtk-update-icon-cache programs could be pushed into their > own subpackage that both gtk2 and gtk3 require. ÂThat might be the best way > to resolve that. In the Fedora 18+ timeframe where we might discuss not shipping gtk2 in the default image, we can revisit this issue =) For now, keeping it in gtk2 seems fine to me. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel