Re: gtk2 2.99.0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 14:13 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >>>>> "MC" == Matthias Clasen <mclasen@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> MC> * gtk-update-icon-cache-3.0 and gtk-builder-convert-3.0 have been
> MC> dropped (since they were identical to their un-suffixed cousins in
> MC> the gtk2 package). If you are using gtk-update-icon-cache in %post
> MC> of a gtk3-using package, you should add Requires(post):
> MC> /usr/bin/gtk-update-icon-cache (and similar for %postun).
> 
> I believe this is incorrect, or at least in conflict with the packaging
> guidelines.  Those guidelines provide scriptlets which handle
> gtk-update-icon-cache not being present, and explicitly indicate that
> dependencies should not be added.
> 
> If the guidelines are incorrect, please let the packaging committee know
> so that we can get them changed.
> 
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache

I guess you are right; as written the scriptlets don't require us to add
those requires, and we are probably fine as long as gtk2 is still
ubiquitous. But if you think of the long-term future, where there might
be a gtk2-less install, we'll eventually make some adjustment here, e.g.
by shipping gtk-update-icon-cache with gtk3 instead of gtk2.

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux