On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 06:54:56PM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 14:13 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > >>>>> "MC" == Matthias Clasen <mclasen@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > MC> * gtk-update-icon-cache-3.0 and gtk-builder-convert-3.0 have been > > MC> dropped (since they were identical to their un-suffixed cousins in > > MC> the gtk2 package). If you are using gtk-update-icon-cache in %post > > MC> of a gtk3-using package, you should add Requires(post): > > MC> /usr/bin/gtk-update-icon-cache (and similar for %postun). > > > > I believe this is incorrect, or at least in conflict with the packaging > > guidelines. Those guidelines provide scriptlets which handle > > gtk-update-icon-cache not being present, and explicitly indicate that > > dependencies should not be added. > > > > If the guidelines are incorrect, please let the packaging committee know > > so that we can get them changed. > > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache > > I guess you are right; as written the scriptlets don't require us to add > those requires, and we are probably fine as long as gtk2 is still > ubiquitous. But if you think of the long-term future, where there might > be a gtk2-less install, we'll eventually make some adjustment here, e.g. > by shipping gtk-update-icon-cache with gtk3 instead of gtk2. > Sounds like the gtk-update-icon-cache programs could be pushed into their own subpackage that both gtk2 and gtk3 require. That might be the best way to resolve that. -Toshio
Attachment:
pgp_hJlVlJzCD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
