Re: Package-specific test case and critical path test case project: drafts for review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 10:58 -0500, James Laska wrote:

> > So, see:
> > 
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Package_xorg-x11-drv-ati_test_cases
> > 
> > and note that one of the test cases is also in:
> > 
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Critical_path_test_cases
> 
> Nice examples, this really helps to visualize the proposed changes.
> 
> So if I were acting as f-e-k or bodhi, I would combine the two lists of
> cases to show the xorg-x11-drv-ati critpath tests...
> 
>       * QA:Testcase radeon basic
> 
> Did I do that correctly?

Yup, indeed, that's the only test case for a graphics driver that
strictly hits our critpath parameters.

> > you can also see at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Test_Cases
> > how this tracks back to that overall category - no test cases are in it
> > directly, it's all hierarchical.
> 
> > [[Category:Test_Cases|X]]
> 
> I did a minor tweak so that it would show up under 'X' (for xorg-x11...)
> rather than 'P' (for Package_xorg-x11...).

Thanks! I forgot that.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux