On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 14:35 +-0000, Adam Williamson wrote: +AD4 On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 17:11 +-0000, Adam Williamson wrote: +AD4 +AD4 Hi, everyone. So, in the recent debate about the update process it again +AD4 +AD4 became clear that we were lacking a good process for providing +AD4 +AD4 package-specific test instructions, and particularly specific +AD4 +AD4 instructions for testing critical path functions. +AD4 +AD4 +AD4 +AD4 I've been working on a process for this, and now have two draft Wiki +AD4 +AD4 pages up for review which together describe it: +AD4 +AD4 +AD4 +AD4 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft+AF8-QA+AF8-SOP+AF8-test+AF8-case+AF8-creation +AD4 +AD4 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft+AF8-QA+AF8-SOP+AF8-package+AF8-test+AF8-plan+AF8-creation +AD4 +AD4 I've now converted one package's set of test cases to the proposed new +AD4 system to serve as an illustration. I used the Radeon driver, +AD4 xorg-x11-drv-ati . This was a good example as there's a lot of them, and +AD4 they split neatly into critpath, core and extended to illustrate the +AD4 optional advanced categorization system. +AD4 +AD4 So, see: +AD4 +AD4 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Package+AF8-xorg-x11-drv-ati+AF8-test+AF8-cases +AD4 +AD4 and note that one of the test cases is also in: +AD4 +AD4 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Critical+AF8-path+AF8-test+AF8-cases Nice examples, this really helps to visualize the proposed changes. So if I were acting as f-e-k or bodhi, I would combine the two lists of cases to show the xorg-x11-drv-ati critpath tests... +ACo QA:Testcase radeon basic Did I do that correctly? +AD4 you can also see at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Test+AF8-Cases +AD4 how this tracks back to that overall category - no test cases are in it +AD4 directly, it's all hierarchical. +AD4 +AFsAWw-Category:Test+AF8-Cases+AHw-X+AF0AXQ I did a minor tweak so that it would show up under 'X' (for xorg-x11...) rather than 'P' (for Package+AF8-xorg-x11...). +AD4 thanks+ACE I'm planning to work on a mockup for the f-e-k and bodhi +AD4 integration this afternoon to show how we envision this all being used +AD4 to kick ass, I think that'll make it clearer. Thanks, James
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
