Jesse Keating pÃÅe v Ãt 14. 12. 2010 v 09:47 -0800: > On 12/14/10 9:22 AM, Miloslav TrmaÄ wrote: > > Bill Nottingham pÃÅe v Ãt 14. 12. 2010 v 12:08 -0500: > >>> The problem is not the technical solution. Problem is that changes of > >>> such important thing like /etc/fstab are decided without Fedora developers. > >> > >> Eh, what? It's a change to how API filesystems (/proc, /sys, etc.) get > >> mounted. When this was done in rc.sysinit, every change to how it mounted > >> /proc wasn't discussed on the devel list. When we switched to having dracut > >> be the primary way that API filesystems are mounted, that wasn't put up > >> to a FESCo vote. > > The practical difference is that nothing broke at that time, whereas > > systemd tends to break thinks that users use. (I won't buy dismissing it > > as "mere bugs" - adding NOEXEC could hardly have been a typo.) > > Perhaps you missed the part where the bug was that the fs doesn't get > remounted with the perms from fstab as by design. That's the bug. So the design was to 1) change the setting in the C reimplementation 2) add a new facility that will revert the setting to its original value ? Is it really surprising that I'd like more discussion of the systemd design in advance? Mirek -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
