On 12/14/10 9:22 AM, Miloslav TrmaÄ wrote: > Bill Nottingham pÃÅe v Ãt 14. 12. 2010 v 12:08 -0500: >>> The problem is not the technical solution. Problem is that changes of >>> such important thing like /etc/fstab are decided without Fedora developers. >> >> Eh, what? It's a change to how API filesystems (/proc, /sys, etc.) get >> mounted. When this was done in rc.sysinit, every change to how it mounted >> /proc wasn't discussed on the devel list. When we switched to having dracut >> be the primary way that API filesystems are mounted, that wasn't put up >> to a FESCo vote. > The practical difference is that nothing broke at that time, whereas > systemd tends to break thinks that users use. (I won't buy dismissing it > as "mere bugs" - adding NOEXEC could hardly have been a typo.) > Mirek > Perhaps you missed the part where the bug was that the fs doesn't get remounted with the perms from fstab as by design. That's the bug. Lets have a little less chest pounding and a little more constructive discussion, mkay? -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
