Re: noexec on /dev/shm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bill Nottingham pÃÅe v Ãt 14. 12. 2010 v 12:08 -0500:
> > The problem is not the technical solution. Problem is that changes of
> > such important thing like /etc/fstab are decided without Fedora developers.
> 
> Eh, what? It's a change to how API filesystems (/proc, /sys, etc.) get
> mounted. When this was done in rc.sysinit, every change to how it mounted
> /proc wasn't discussed on the devel list. When we switched to having dracut
> be the primary way that API filesystems are mounted, that wasn't put up
> to a FESCo vote. 
The practical difference is that nothing broke at that time, whereas
systemd tends to break thinks that users use. (I won't buy dismissing it
as "mere bugs" - adding NOEXEC could hardly have been a typo.)
	Mirek

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux