On Tue, 14.12.10 18:22, Miloslav TrmaÄ (mitr@xxxxxxxx) wrote: > Bill Nottingham pÃÅe v Ãt 14. 12. 2010 v 12:08 -0500: > > > The problem is not the technical solution. Problem is that changes of > > > such important thing like /etc/fstab are decided without Fedora developers. > > > > Eh, what? It's a change to how API filesystems (/proc, /sys, etc.) get > > mounted. When this was done in rc.sysinit, every change to how it mounted > > /proc wasn't discussed on the devel list. When we switched to having dracut > > be the primary way that API filesystems are mounted, that wasn't put up > > to a FESCo vote. > The practical difference is that nothing broke at that time, whereas > systemd tends to break thinks that users use. (I won't buy dismissing it > as "mere bugs" - adding NOEXEC could hardly have been a typo.) > Mirek > "tends to break"? On what is that founded? Have you filed bugs? Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
