Re: insane -19 nice level for system service (mailgraph) - is it acceptable?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



MichaÅ Piotrowski <mkkp4x4@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> 2010/12/8 Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>> Once upon a time, MichaÅ Piotrowski <mkkp4x4@xxxxxxxxx> said:
>>> I noticed that this service uses insane nice level -19
>>> http://notendur.hi.is/~johannbg/systemd/etc/rc.d/init.d/mailgraph
>>> 8-|
>>>
>>> PRIORITY=-19
>>> [..]
>>> Â Â daemon nice $PRIORITY $exe -l $MAILLOG -d \
>>>     --daemon-pid=/var/run/mailgraph.pid  \
>>> Â Â Â Â --daemon-rrd=/var/lib/mailgraph $OPTIONS
>>>
>>> The same priority is used in the sample script. Does this service
>>> _really_ needs such insane nice level?
>>
>> Why do you (repeatedly) call it "insane"? ÂThat's kind of rude.
>
> Sorry :)
>
>> ÂThe
>> process is running at a low priority level;
>
> Nice -19 is the _higest_ priority - not low.

No, it isn't.  This is nice -19 == nice -n 19.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab@xxxxxxxxxx
GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84  5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E
"And now for something completely different."
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux