Once upon a time, Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx> said: > On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 10:57:21 -0600, > Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Once upon a time, MichaÅ Piotrowski <mkkp4x4@xxxxxxxxx> said: > > > > > > PRIORITY=-19 > > > Why do you (repeatedly) call it "insane"? That's kind of rude. The > > process is running at a low priority level; do you have a problem with > > that? > > Aren't negative priorities higher? I think this is running at the max > priority, not the min one. Negative priorities are higher, but that's not what is being set. For historical compatibilty, "nice" takes a numeric option as a nice value, so "nice -n X" is the same as "nice -X" (it appears this behavior is not documented). You can verify this: $ nice -n 19 ps -o nice,cmd NI CMD 19 ps -o nice,cmd $ nice -19 ps -o nice,cmd NI CMD 19 ps -o nice,cmd -- Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
