Re: insane -19 nice level for system service (mailgraph) - is it acceptable?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Once upon a time, MichaÅ Piotrowski <mkkp4x4@xxxxxxxxx> said:
> 2010/12/8 Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> > Once upon a time, MichaÅ Piotrowski <mkkp4x4@xxxxxxxxx> said:
> >> I noticed that this service uses insane nice level -19
> >> http://notendur.hi.is/~johannbg/systemd/etc/rc.d/init.d/mailgraph
> >> 8-|
> >>
> >> PRIORITY=-19
> >> [..]
> >> Â Â daemon nice $PRIORITY $exe -l $MAILLOG -d \
> >>     --daemon-pid=/var/run/mailgraph.pid  \
> >> Â Â Â Â --daemon-rrd=/var/lib/mailgraph $OPTIONS
> >>
> >> The same priority is used in the sample script. Does this service
> >> _really_ needs such insane nice level?
> >
> > Why do you (repeatedly) call it "insane"? ÂThat's kind of rude.
> 
> Sorry :)
> 
> > ÂThe
> > process is running at a low priority level;
> 
> Nice -19 is the _higest_ priority - not low.

I suggest you try the exact command given (and yes, the "nice" command
is confusing).

-- 
Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux