On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 15:59 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > I'm not sure I'd want to go quite that far unless the sign-up process > can wave the proven testers instructions in your face quite prominently. > They're short and easy to read and understand, but you can't infer them > from first principles: we do want to have people read the proven tester > instructions before becoming proven testers. That's actually the *only* > requirement to become a proven tester. :) Would it be appropriate to allow anyone to become a proven tester just by confirming they have read the instructions? I'm an interested user and very minor contributor, not a packager, and I have been using updates-testing since April. I was turned off by the approval process, but I would probably sign up if it were automatic. Then again, I'm not using SELinux and don't wish to enable it at this time, so maybe you don't want me leaving +1s. One issue: as a proven tester, I would lose the ability to leave non-proven-tester karma if I only have interest in testing a package to lower standards. (It makes me wonder what the standards for non-proven-tester karma are assumed to be. Is proven-testership the EV of karma? Heh.) -- Matt -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
