On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 07:06:33PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Till Maas wrote: > > Afaik there is no need for a maintainer to set different acceptance > > thresholds for his updates. At least nobody ever explained to me why > > this would be helpful. > > * Upgrade paths! I DON'T want my foo-1.2.3-4.fc13 update to go out before my > foo-1.2.3-4.fc14 update, even if it happens to get karma first. > * Possibility to look at the feedback. E.g. if an update has "-1, deletes > all my e-mail", "+1, can haz noo verzion?" and "+1, didn't test e-mail, > everything else works", I'm NOT going to push the update! > * Because people just make better decisions than software, period. > > In fact, IMHO automatic pushing is completely stupid, and the current > process which heavily relies on it is just broken. I did not write about the automatic pushing threshold but only about the acceptance threshold. Regards Till
Attachment:
pgpGBu9OdUHMS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
