Re: Updates Criteria Summary/Brainstorming

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 16:39 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 12:02 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> >> Critpath requires +1 proven tester and +1 anybody.  Total of +2.  Non
> >> crit-path requires a minimum of +1 anybody or a 7 day timeout I do believe.
> >> 
> >> I do not believe we require +3 anywhere.  We /default/ the karma
> >> autopush level at +3/-3, but that's just a suggestion.
> 
> > we should probably change it to +2 or even +1.
> 
> Yeah.  Or at least document that the maintainer is allowed to reduce it;
> that's entirely unclear given the current policy and bodhi UI.

The bodhi 2.0 solution is to decouple autopush and acceptance: they
really shouldn't be paired, I think it's just an unintended consequence
of the current code. You should be able to set +1 threshold for
acceptance allowing the maintainer to then push manually, and +3 for
autopush, for instance.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux