Re: Updates Criteria Summary/Brainstorming

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 02:18:45PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 16:39 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > > On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 12:02 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > >> Critpath requires +1 proven tester and +1 anybody.  Total of +2.  Non
> > >> crit-path requires a minimum of +1 anybody or a 7 day timeout I do believe.
> > >> 
> > >> I do not believe we require +3 anywhere.  We /default/ the karma
> > >> autopush level at +3/-3, but that's just a suggestion.
> > 
> > > we should probably change it to +2 or even +1.
> > 
> > Yeah.  Or at least document that the maintainer is allowed to reduce it;
> > that's entirely unclear given the current policy and bodhi UI.
> 
> The bodhi 2.0 solution is to decouple autopush and acceptance: they
> really shouldn't be paired, I think it's just an unintended consequence
> of the current code. You should be able to set +1 threshold for
> acceptance allowing the maintainer to then push manually, and +3 for
> autopush, for instance.

Afaik there is no need for a maintainer to set different acceptance
thresholds for his updates. At least nobody ever explained to me why
this would be helpful.

Regards
Till

Attachment: pgpBrtEOrJQDW.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux