Re: The new Update Acceptance Criteria are broken

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/12/2010 02:32 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Till Maas<opensource@xxxxxxxxx>  writes:
>> <snip>
>
> It's absolutely crystal clear to me that we don't have enough tester
> manpower to make the current policy workable; it's past time to stop
> denying that.  I'd suggest narrowing the policy to a small number of
> critical packages, for which there might be some hope of it actually
> working as designed.
>
> 			regards, tom lane


Test cases would help alleviate manpower issues.  Many of the security 
updates and regular updates are outside my area and I feel some 
frustration that I have to bypass providing karma; however, I am used to 
doing QA work with test cases.  Are they so hard to provide?  Maybe 
certain updates should have test cases, i.e., security updates and 
critical path updates.

Regards,
OldFart
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux