On 11/06/2010 07:39 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 05:28:08PM +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: >> First I think you should probably head over to the Wayland mailing list and >> get involved there. That's something I also recommend to Richard because if >> you want certain features to be present now is a good time to make your >> voices heard over there. > > It's already been done, and the developers have been busily rejecting > them out of hand, eg: > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/2010-November/000028.html > [1] > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/2010-November/000031.html > > https://groups.google.com/group/wayland-display-server/browse_thread/thread/e7ed0c0118fb31b4?hl=en.# > > Rich. > > [1] As an aside, the point the original poster in that thread makes > about client-side decorations is very valid. If you've used Windows > or OS X at all, you'll have seen how a buggy application can > monopolize the display so nothing can be moved or killed or switched. > So they consider this a layering violation which makes sense given that Wayland has a much smaller scope than X. That doesn't mean you cannot implement remote applications at all it just means you have to implemented in a different way. Regards, Dennis -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
