On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 03:14:57PM +0000, Pierre Carrier wrote: > On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 13:51, Camilo Mesias <camilo@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> With virtualization I have more Linux machines than ever (about 50 in > >> active use at last count). All on my local 1GB network. Consequently > >> I use X to them and to other physical machines _all the time_. > > If there is no way to provide remote access for Weyland based systems > > (and I hope there will be a way that is "more than adequate") then I > > can see the day when desktop users wanting a high quality experience > > and server users part company... > > Am I the only one would wants to scream SPICE since the beginning of > this discussion? > > We could have a virtualization-free userspace SPICE server and I > believe that could be an excellent replacement to VNC, with > significantly better performance and features (stuff like sound, > anyone?). > > Richard, you're even specifying virtualization! SPICE is already here! AFAIK SPICE is just faster, better VNC with more features. It doesn't allow you to remote a single app, doesn't work transparently through ssh, and doesn't allow multiple servers and clients connecting in ad hoc ways at the same time. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any software inside the virtual machine. Supports Linux and Windows. http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-df/ -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
