On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 11:57:58 +0100, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: > * Orcan Ogetbil [04/11/2010 09:35] : >> >> The extreme inefficiency comes from the bugs that I can't reproduce, >> the upstream can't reproduce, and the user isn't responding. And this >> happens *a lot*. Most of the time, they don't even put down the steps >> to reproduce. Can we at least mandate including the steps to reproduce >> in the ABRT reports? > > Is there any reason you can't close these bugs with a INSUFFICIENT_DATA > resolution? This seems to be the most appropriate thing to do in this > case. > Even better: can abrt-reported bugs that have been NEEDINFO for more than, say, 7 days be automatically closed INSUFFICIENT_DATA? That'd be quite a huge timesaver. Better duplicate detection would be nice too. -- Michel Alexandre Salim Fedora Project Contributor: http://fedoraproject.org/ Email: salimma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | GPG key ID: 78884778 Jabber: hircus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx | IRC: hircus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
