2010/10/25 Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx>
On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 21:24:30 +0300
Kalev Lember <kalev@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 10/20/2010 03:02 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > The question is (we agreed on KDE SIG meeting yesterday) - should we
> > update Qt to 4.7 too or build KDE stack with current 4.6 series? As
> > there are a few Qt packages outside of KDE SIG/Qt maintainers scope,
> > we'd like to hear any objections against update - bugs we can fix
> > etc. Qt 4.7 is quite well tested, thanks to work on Fedora 14 (Qt
> > 4.7 is already included) and a lot of users are actually using this
> > combination in Fedora 13.
>
> KDE is pretty much self contained, whereas a Qt upgrade affects a much
> larger number of packages. I don't think updating Qt to a new major
> version in a stable Fedora release is a good idea; it just causes too
> much churn.
...snip...
I agree with Kalev here. Qt upgrade in a stable release is to be
avoided unless there's some severe bug or security issue that can't be
backported.
kevin
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
I have KDE 4.5.2 in my Fedora 13 wich as far as I understand uses the last
version of Qt, the computer is working Flawlessly :D
--
<-Manuel Escudero->
Linux User #509052
@GWave: jmlevick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
@Blogger: http://www.blogxenode.tk/ (Xenode Systems Blog)
PGP/GnuPG: DAE3 82E9 D68E 7AE4 ED31Â 1F8F 4AF4 D00C 50E7 ABC6
--
<-Manuel Escudero->
Linux User #509052
@GWave: jmlevick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
@Blogger: http://www.blogxenode.tk/ (Xenode Systems Blog)
PGP/GnuPG: DAE3 82E9 D68E 7AE4 ED31Â 1F8F 4AF4 D00C 50E7 ABC6
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
