On 10/20/2010 03:02 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > The question is (we agreed on KDE SIG meeting yesterday) - should we > update Qt to 4.7 too or build KDE stack with current 4.6 series? As > there are a few Qt packages outside of KDE SIG/Qt maintainers scope, > we'd like to hear any objections against update - bugs we can fix > etc. Qt 4.7 is quite well tested, thanks to work on Fedora 14 (Qt 4.7 > is already included) and a lot of users are actually using this > combination in Fedora 13. KDE is pretty much self contained, whereas a Qt upgrade affects a much larger number of packages. I don't think updating Qt to a new major version in a stable Fedora release is a good idea; it just causes too much churn. I am sure there will be bugs in other packages which need to be fixed to work with Qt 4.7. Some of these bugs are going to be fixed in next upstream releases, so people would just need to upgrade their packages and build for F13. Other packages are going to work fine, but fail to rebuild against Qt 4.7 if someone tries (consider security updates: a build which starts suddenly failing when you need to get a two-line security fix quickly out is not so fun). I personally would not call it a stable release any more: a release where lots of the apps need to be rebuilt, and lots of other apps need to go through integration testing again is not a stable release. It's a rolling development release. In my opinion a Qt 4.7 update is pure F-14 material. As you say, it is working pretty well on Fedora 14 which is going to be released very soon, so why is there need for Qt 4.7 on F-13? Thanks for all the nice work on Fedora 14 by the way! -- Kalev -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
