On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 21:24:30 +0300 Kalev Lember <kalev@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 10/20/2010 03:02 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > > The question is (we agreed on KDE SIG meeting yesterday) - should we > > update Qt to 4.7 too or build KDE stack with current 4.6 series? As > > there are a few Qt packages outside of KDE SIG/Qt maintainers scope, > > we'd like to hear any objections against update - bugs we can fix > > etc. Qt 4.7 is quite well tested, thanks to work on Fedora 14 (Qt > > 4.7 is already included) and a lot of users are actually using this > > combination in Fedora 13. > > KDE is pretty much self contained, whereas a Qt upgrade affects a much > larger number of packages. I don't think updating Qt to a new major > version in a stable Fedora release is a good idea; it just causes too > much churn. ...snip... I agree with Kalev here. Qt upgrade in a stable release is to be avoided unless there's some severe bug or security issue that can't be backported. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
