On 10/12/2010 02:23 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Chitlesh GOORAH (chitlesh.goorah@xxxxxxxxx) said: >> Milkymist community builds and enhance their own toolchain (currently >> not fully supported by Fedora). ... > OK, that's clear. But I am worried that if we go down this road, we'll > eventually have 20 or 30 groups for different SoCs for embedded use, The electronics lab community is a generic concept, with clearly defined, self-evident scope and specific FOSS software products. Milkymist on the other hand has two problems: - it is not a mainstream interest--I try to keep up with embedded and electronic topics and I have never heard of it, which of course doesn't mean it isn't worthy. As Bill said, we should be careful how we organize the information, because otherwise it'll be hard to find anything. Grouping milkymist with something else electronics isn't a bad idea. - related to that, the term 'milkymist' is obscure: google returns hits for some sort of VJ software as well. "Milkymist embedded visualization hardware project" might be excessively long, but surely there's a happy middle somewhere. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
