On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Bill Nottingham <> wrote: > OK, that's clear. But I am worried that if we go down this road, we'll > eventually have 20 or 30 groups for different SoCs for embedded use, > and that seems like it will eventually be problematic. Is there some > generic moniker that could be used for this usage? To be honest that would be a great idea. But I don't know any other active and vibrant community like milkymist and openmoko alike. I suggest that, let it be like this. If it gets momentum and other HW communities pop in, we can rename it, I won't object. >From a strategy perspective, let's bring forces together and show that this model works. It does, then good for us and our efforts brought several communities into our wagon. What do you think, let it be its roadmap ? regards, Chitlesh -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
